Each series was researched independently. Each includes counter-interpretations and falsifiers. Every cell below links to the full article with the strongest opposing case. The structure you see is the structure we found.
Six series, researched independently, each revealing the same structure: a policy decision that expanded spending or exposure, costs that landed on the people the policy claimed to help, and a reversal by the government that made the original decision. The question that connects them is the one no individual series can answer alone: across all six, where did the money go — and what did it build?
Every summary above is drawn from the corresponding article, which includes the full evidence base, the strongest counter-interpretation, and the specific conditions under which the analysis would need to be revised. The pattern is presented without editorial commentary. Whether it constitutes a systemic failure, a series of independent misjudgments, or a reasonable sequence of decisions in difficult circumstances is for the reader to assess.